搜搜做题作业网看一部电影,写观后感 要英语的
来源：学生作业帮 编辑：搜搜做题作业网作业帮 分类：英语作业 时间：2024/05/27 14:34:00
看一部电影,写观后感 要英语的
随便什麽电影 人物 地方场景 情节 冲突（矛盾） 解决等等
希望能有中文解释
随便什麽电影 人物 地方场景 情节 冲突（矛盾） 解决等等
希望能有中文解释
这是我以前的作业,希望能帮上忙~~
The Worst Film that I Have Ever Seen
To me, a good film should contain a good story, an all-star cast with excellent performance, and of course there should be good directors and cameramen. “100 Million BC” is the worst film that I have ever seen, because it cannot match all my standers, and because it made me felt I have been deceived by the producer and have wasted EIGHTY minutes watching it.
I always consider myself a wise-movie-viewer as I only watch films of high box office so that the bad ones can be filtered out. One day I was informed that a movie about human beings living in remote antiquity had the highest box office in America, so I googled it and found “100 Million BC”. Judging from the poster and the introduction, I thought that it must be wonderful. However, when I finally finished watching it I was rather confused: The introduction said that it was about people living in the past, but only less than 40 minutes of the performances have something to do with the advertisement and the other scenes are shot in the modern NewYork City. In the poster there are an enormous animal and a very beautiful sword which attract me so much, while they cannot be seen from the beginning to the end. I felt something must be wrong and I googled it again. Then I ultimately realized that it was another movie with a very similar title got the highest box office, not 100 Million BC. 100 Million BC’s producer chose a title similar to the well-known one intending to cheat the viewers. What was worse, the poster and the introduction were “borrowed” from the successful one.
To be sure, a movie got a similar topic to the other one is unforgivable (if it was a mistake), and it can also be a good one. The point is I could find nothing but disappointment in “100 Million BC”. First, its stage prop was poor and the stunts were unwatchable. The time machine looked like a stupid metal stick, as though it was got from the garbage bin. Dinosaurs looked like big toys, even the teenagers who have some skills on three-dimensional animation making can do them better. The next point is that the way they cut the film is too strange. On this second I saw a group of people walking in the forest and on the next second they were climbing a bare mountain. When those people were standing on the mountain, a sea suddenly irrupted into the scene. The camera moved so fast that it made me puzzled. The third point is that there are some loopholes. For example, in the last twenty minutes, the chief actors and actresses jumped off the plane in the hope of stopping the dinosaur destroying the city. I could see clearly that when they reached the ground they were not carrying any weapon, but a few minutes later one of the actors took an arrow from his back and shot the dinosaur. At last I have to say the cast is too bad. Actually I do complain about their performance. The scientist seemed not to be clever enough so that it is unbelievable to let him in charge of such an important project—sent people back to prehistoric. And the so-called chief actress, when she met her boyfriend again after separated for six years, she had not any excitement and passion on her face, as if they were not lovers.
After I have finished watching this “100 Million BC”, I learnt a lesson: when you are going to download a movie, you had better check the critics reviews, or you may be fooled by the producers.
The Worst Film that I Have Ever Seen
To me, a good film should contain a good story, an all-star cast with excellent performance, and of course there should be good directors and cameramen. “100 Million BC” is the worst film that I have ever seen, because it cannot match all my standers, and because it made me felt I have been deceived by the producer and have wasted EIGHTY minutes watching it.
I always consider myself a wise-movie-viewer as I only watch films of high box office so that the bad ones can be filtered out. One day I was informed that a movie about human beings living in remote antiquity had the highest box office in America, so I googled it and found “100 Million BC”. Judging from the poster and the introduction, I thought that it must be wonderful. However, when I finally finished watching it I was rather confused: The introduction said that it was about people living in the past, but only less than 40 minutes of the performances have something to do with the advertisement and the other scenes are shot in the modern NewYork City. In the poster there are an enormous animal and a very beautiful sword which attract me so much, while they cannot be seen from the beginning to the end. I felt something must be wrong and I googled it again. Then I ultimately realized that it was another movie with a very similar title got the highest box office, not 100 Million BC. 100 Million BC’s producer chose a title similar to the well-known one intending to cheat the viewers. What was worse, the poster and the introduction were “borrowed” from the successful one.
To be sure, a movie got a similar topic to the other one is unforgivable (if it was a mistake), and it can also be a good one. The point is I could find nothing but disappointment in “100 Million BC”. First, its stage prop was poor and the stunts were unwatchable. The time machine looked like a stupid metal stick, as though it was got from the garbage bin. Dinosaurs looked like big toys, even the teenagers who have some skills on three-dimensional animation making can do them better. The next point is that the way they cut the film is too strange. On this second I saw a group of people walking in the forest and on the next second they were climbing a bare mountain. When those people were standing on the mountain, a sea suddenly irrupted into the scene. The camera moved so fast that it made me puzzled. The third point is that there are some loopholes. For example, in the last twenty minutes, the chief actors and actresses jumped off the plane in the hope of stopping the dinosaur destroying the city. I could see clearly that when they reached the ground they were not carrying any weapon, but a few minutes later one of the actors took an arrow from his back and shot the dinosaur. At last I have to say the cast is too bad. Actually I do complain about their performance. The scientist seemed not to be clever enough so that it is unbelievable to let him in charge of such an important project—sent people back to prehistoric. And the so-called chief actress, when she met her boyfriend again after separated for six years, she had not any excitement and passion on her face, as if they were not lovers.
After I have finished watching this “100 Million BC”, I learnt a lesson: when you are going to download a movie, you had better check the critics reviews, or you may be fooled by the producers.