英语翻译要求不高：能理清汉语意思就OK,纯单词组合HistoryA distinction should be made

英语翻译
要求不高：能理清汉语意思就OK,纯单词组合
History
A distinction should be made between uniforms and ethnic dress.If a particular people or culture favoured a distinctive dress style this could easily create the impression of uniformly dressed warriors.The issue is further complicated by the fact that the distinctive features of particularly effective warrior classes were often copied - weapons,armor,fighting style and native dress.Thus the distinctive and colourful clothing of the Hungarian hussars became a model for hussar units all over Europe.The kilts and sporrans of Scottish highland clans were distilled into regimental dress when the British Army started to recruit from these tribal groups.
Mercenary or irregular fighters could also develop their own fashions,which set them apart from civilians,but were not really uniforms.The clothing of the German Landsknechte of the 16th century is an example of distinctive military fashion.
Antiquity
There are a few recorded attempts at uniform dress in antiquity,going beyond the similarity to be expected of ethnic or tribal dress.One example is the Spanish infantry of Hannibal who wore white tunics with crimson edgings.Another is the Spartan hoplite in his red garment.The terracotta army discovered in the tomb of the first Emperor of Chin (c.200 BC) have a superficial similarity but closer examination shows up to seven different styles of armour,which do not appear to have been standardised within separate units.
Rome
The legions of the Roman Republic and Empire wore fairly standardised dress and armour.However the concept of uniforms was not part of their culture and there were considerable differences in detail.Even the armour mass produced in state factories varied according to the province of origin.Fragments of surviving clothing and wall paintings indicate that the basic tunic of the Roman soldier was of red or undyed (off-white) wool.Senior commanders are known to have worn white cloaks and plumes.The centurions who made up the long serving backbone of the legions were distinguished by traverse crests on their helmets,chest ornaments corresponding to modern medals and the long cudgels that they carried.
Late Roman and Byzantine
The regular thematic (provincial) and Tagmata (central) troops of the Byzantine Empire (East Roman) are the first known soldiers to have had what would now be considered regimental or unit identification.During the tenth century AD each of the cavalry "banda" making up these forces is recorded as having plumes and other distinctions in a distinctive colour.While some auxiliary cohorts in the late Roman period had carried shields with distinctive colours or designs,there is no evidence that any one Roman legion was distinguished from another by features other than the numbers on the leather covers protecting their shields.

历史 应该区分A在制服和种族礼服之间. 如果特殊人或文化倾向了特别礼服样式这可能容易地创造一致地加工好的战士印象. 问题由事实进一步复杂化特别有效的战士类特征经常被复制了-武器、装甲、战斗的样式和当地礼服. 因而匈牙利轻骑兵的特别和五颜六色的衣物在欧洲成为了轻骑兵单位的一个模型. 当英国军队开始从这些部族小组,吸收苏格兰高地氏族苏格兰男用短裙和毛皮袋被蒸馏了入团礼服.
Mercenary或不规则的战斗机可能也开发他们自己的时尚,除平民之外,设置他们,但是真正地不是制服. 16世纪的德国Landsknechte的衣物是特别军事时尚的例子.
Antiquity
There是一些个记录的尝试在上古的一致的礼服,超出将期望的相似性范围种族或部族礼服. 一个例子是佩带与绯红色edgings的白色长袍Hannibal的西班牙步兵. 别的是在他的红色服装的斯巴达古代希腊的重装备步兵. 在第一个皇帝的坟茔发现的赤土陶器军队下巴(c. 200 BC)有表面相似性,但是周密的调查展示由装甲决定七不同样式,不看上去在分开的单位之内被规范化了.
Rome 罗马共和国和帝国的The军队佩带了相当规范化的礼服和装甲. 然而制服的概念没有作为他们的文化的部分,并且详细有可观的区别. 装甲在根据省变化的状态工厂大量生产起源. 生存衣物和壁画的片段表明罗马战士的基本的长袍是红色或未染色的(米色)羊毛. 高级将领知道有被穿着的白色斗篷和羽毛. 组成长的服务中坚军队的百人队队长由他们运载他们的盔甲的横冠,胸口装饰品与现代奖牌相应和长的短棍区别. 拜占庭式的Late罗马和 拜占庭式的帝国(东部罗马)的The规则主题(省)和Tagmata (中央)队伍是第一位已知的战士有什么现在将被认为团或单位证明. 在骑兵“banda”的第十个世纪广告其中每一个期间组成这些力量被记录作为有羽毛和其他分别在一种特别颜色. 当在罗马期间末期的一些辅助一队人运载了与特别颜色或设计时的盾,没有证据证明所有一个罗马军队从别的是卓越的由特点除在保护他们的盾的皮革盖子的数字之外.